I'm really not comfortable with that to be honest. I need to be able to review the edits being done, and it's better that I do it myself, especially since you seem to have complaints when your edits get reverted.
But I'll go ahead and make a bot account myself since I have been meaning to do technical work on this wiki since I became an admin. As I'm sure you've noticed I can be forgetful so if I say I'll do something it helps to remind me if I don't.
Can you maybe not rollback my edits without giving an explanation? Those edits were clearly made in good faith, and the rollback tool is generally used only for reverting vandalism/bad-faith edits.
That said, I'm not sure why you have a problem with that specific edit I made today; linking to the same pages twice is redundant, and italics should be used for the names/titles of major works such as books, films, and TV shows. These types of formatting are recognized in most style guides across the Fandom network, as well as Wikipedia.
You use a rollback script for edits made in good faith yourself (example), so it's hard for me to understand your outrage about that. That said I didn't realize there was a 2nd link, so you're correct that should be removed. I reverted because I didn't realize that and thought you were removing the only link. You're also correct about the italics, but I didn't notice that since I just saw the link removal.
I already explained that we use the redirects to make the code cleaner and that the edits were unconstructive on their own merits. Every time I edit a page I need to fix that so I figured I'd do it all at once.
Another thing I'd like to bring up: there are a number of pages here (ICarly Wiki Community Policy, Userboxes etc.) that are currently in the main namespace. Pages such as these are generally put in the project namespace on most wikis so I was wondering if you would consider moving them.
Mr. Paladino was deleted when I nuked the contributions of a block evading vandal. You can recreate that if you wish. The two pages you mention are in mainspace to enable comments. I get that's not ideal but I'm not willing to disable commenting on those pages, so moving isn't feasible given Fandom's limitations.
Yeah, no worries. I was gonna recreate the page tomorrow if you didn't. And I know there's some kind of switch staff can flick behind the scenes to enable comments on a per namespace basis, but AFAIK it's all or nothing, and there are project pages where article comments wouldn't make sense. There used to be some code you could put in a page that would hide the comments for just that but staff disabled that some years back. So yeah, keeping it the way it is is the least imperfect compromise solution.
well it's the police officer's parole officer's judge's and lawyer's job to decide who gets to be grounded and punished and put in time out not a parent or a teacher or a friend and family member or a brother and sister or a legal guardian.
In IPie the operating system on the computer is actually Windows 95. In I Move Out It would have been impossible for Freddie to get an apartment because you have to be 18 to rent an apartment. I tried editing it but I don’t have permission so can you help me with it.
iPie is done but I'm not sure about second one. As I know if both your parents agree and the house keeper is ok with it you can rent a house if you are a teen. Freddie was 16 i think (not sure). I know because I rented a house at 17.