Talk:Seddie/@comment-3180503-20141125193247/@comment-24275744-20141125201159

The characters of iCarly and Victorious certainly had their wackiness but they also had subtleties. The characters of S&C were basically a parody of the Sam and Cat from their previous show (as we have discussed). Sam from iCarly and Sam from S&C were two completely different people. Sure iCarly Sam wasn't a peach but the "mean" things she did was always in a teasing and playful manner. S&C Sam was downright rude and all she did was eat. Victorious Cat was not the brightest crayon, but she was sweet and fun. S&C Cat was just a complete and utter idiot. S&C didn't give their characters any redeeming qualities or subtleties to remind you that they are more than what is on the surface.

On top of that, you didn't give 2 effs about the secondary characters. On iCarly, you cared about the other characters besides Carly. I cared way more about Sam and Freddie than I did Carly. Dan didn't even try to make you care about Dice, Goomer or Nona or give them some kind of important connection to the stars of the show. (I always thought S&C would have been way more interesting if Dice would have had a crush on Sam - obviously not recipricated because of the age.  Like Chelsea and Cory on That's So Raven)