Talk:Seddie/@comment-6314968-20130219051625

You know, I don't mind Creddiers coming on this page and expressing their point of view or even having a rational debate about this Seddie and Creddie business. What I don't like is Creddiers coming on this page and making accusations that a) they're guilty of just as much if not more and b) attempt to attack the credibility of the poster instead of the argument. Please say why you disagree instead of accusing us of offending you and "bashing". What's particularly galling about what happened today is that @Godlovesusall is bashing us (if indirectly) and is offensive because he's talking down to us like we're stupid for disagreeing with him. This wouldn't be such an issue if we could stick to the validity of the arguments made instead of leveling accusations at each other.

FYI to all involved: The best sign of someone losing an argument is that they attack the poster instead of the argument. This can be done in many ways. @Godlovesusall seems to be doing this indirectly to keep the mods from applying the punishment they would apply if he resorted to straight up personal attacks. I'm not saying that @Godlovesusall can't rationally debate Seddiers. I'm sure he could. All I'm saying is that by going after the poster (however indirectly) he's not making his position look better. If he wants to debate Seddie and Creddie rationally without leveling attack at Seddiers and talking down to them I welcome it.