Talk:Creddie/@comment-4463399-20111002192245/@comment-4509465-20111002231935

@X3

But the thing was, GiantKid's post was a SEDDIE related post, on the SEDDIE page. It was a theory on how Seddie could be endgame.

The blog that @Saint posted was ANTI-Creddie. Not exactly Anti Creddie, but it shoots down the hope of Creddie happening and gives the belief that Creddie won't happen again.

It's DIFFERENT. I'm all for defending someone who is posting hopeful things on the page in which it belongs on, but if someone posts something that basically shoots down the whole hope of the page, why post it here at all? :P

Honestly, didn't you tell me you weren't here for long? I've been on this wiki for over a year, and trust me, I've had my issues on ship warring, and commenting on this page. (Ask anyone) But the thing is, I've learned from my mistakes, and I know not to post anything here unless it's either off-topic, or is pro-Creddie. :P