Talk:Seddie/@comment-24416426-20140829022330/@comment-14284535-20140829141825

Yes, please. I am tired of all these backhanded references to something I don't know even squat about.

Along with that, could someone *please* explain why we should believe these references to activity on the Victorious set. As with the Jathan rumours, they may be internally consistent and plausible inferences, but they are merely inferences without any facts to back them up.