Talk:Creddie/@comment-4184884-20121218150744

I had a question for you guys based on what CartoonPrincess asked.

It seems like the general consensus for creddiers is that if Seddie did happen on Sam & Cat, you wouldn't count it because it's a spin-off that would likely ignore what happened in iCarly (which, in your view, had Carly and Freddie getting together).

But, would that change if Sam & Cat did acknowledge what happened on iCarly? Say Freddie mentioned on Sam & Cat that he & Carly kissed, but then Dan went on to have the characters explain the kiss away the same way he did on his blog: As a kiss that had no relationship implications and was more of a goodbye?

Obviously, Dan's comments on his blog about the kiss were him trying to placate seddie shippers. No denying that at all. But, if that was the reasoning he used in his blog to placate seddie shippers, whose to say it wouldn't be the reasoning he'd use to further placate them in Sam & Cat?

Or is acknowledgemnet of iCarly events not the issue at all? Is it simply because Sam & Cat is a new show that you'd view it seperately, even if it did account for things that happened in the iCarly universe?

I should clarify I don't want Nathan on Sam & Cat for a variety of reasons, lest anyone get the wrong idea about me asking this. I'm just genuinely curious.