Talk:Seddie/@comment-4072680-20110615165152

So here is my view on the seddie creddie debate.

I see Creddie as a patient with a terminal illness their chances of survival very thin almost obselete they only have hope and that may not save them in the end.

I see Seddie as the extremley healthy extremeley fit patient all upside and plenty of life to live but i also realize a healthy person can get hit by a bus and have there life ended in an instance.

So if you asked me who had the better chance of survival in the end the terminal patient (Creddie) or the healthy patient (Seddie) I would say healthy patient everytime but just try to remember just because the healthy patients chances of long life look great doesnt mean that there life wont be taken in an instant. And just because the terminal patients life expectancy is almost none at best doesnt mean that hope and a miracle wont save them.

I hope that the comparison of a terminal patient and healthy patient didnt offend anyone that wasnt my goal.

All Credit for this post goes to SlappyWiggins I just coppied it.

I think this is a pretty great example of the creddie seddie debate what do you guyz think?