Thread:CreddieCupcake/@comment-11125355-20130109014734/@comment-3247345-20130117025200

1. She stood up to you about whatever euphemism  you want to use for what happened to me.

2. We also both know I'm not some spawn of Satan hell bent on destroying the wiki but that hasn't stopped you from trying to paint me as one. In any case whether I'm a "saint" or not and whether bias exists are two different questions and you're conflating the two. You're not mad about what I did. You're mad about who I did it to. You wouldn't be on my case like this had that not been your friend I told off on Twitter.

3. It's funnier how I didn't have any problems here for 20 months then the minute I pissed off your friend I got the executioner’s  axe. You really seem to think it was justified. The problem is you were going off personal prejudice, not the policies, at least not in the way they're supposed to be used. The reason you closed it is because several people had asked for it to be reconsidered and you knew more were coming. It was closed to suppress anyone who dares say I'm not some evil user bent on destroying the wiki. I call it a lynching for several reasons, the main one being its main purpose was to terrorize anyone who went against your friends (particularly Socks). The underlying message was clear: Tow the line or you'll end up like cooldog. Of course there was a punative element given the administration's determination to crush with anyoen who goes against your friends swiftly and brutally but even that is to cause fear. Anyone who wasn't already out for my head can see this. I'm still unclear as to why I was supposed to march into the  execution chamber without a fight.

4. I'm here for my friends who saw this for what it  was—settling your friends' personal scores with the ban button. They backed me up and I'm here to do the same for them. Besides, this little incident weeded out the backstabbers who only faked being my friends. I learned a little lesson from all this: Always assume other users are out to screw you over because they probably are. I'm here for the real ones who don't backstab when it becomes convenient. I also don't see why it's so much to ask for a banning policy that doesn't vary with the target's standing with the administration. The whole banning policy has been  subjugated to revenge driven administrator politics. That's different than me not liking what going on.

@Icy You sure did.

@CC Alica's continued sabre rattling is making that very hard to believe. The real unfortunate thing is that Socks realized how this place is run back when she was first banned. Had I listened to her I might not be in the mess I'm in right now. I'm done blinding myself to the nasty reality of how this place is really run.



  



