Talk:Creddie/@comment-3101374-20120803071329/@comment-2032682-20120803203207

Dan is teasing both sides as usual.

He's doing his 'play ignorant' trick, where he'll talk about Sam and Freddie as individual characters or their friendship and not confirm anything to do with "Seddie" as in the relationship.

Nothing Dan says means anything. It's always whatever the reader wants to see, without ever being anything that actually cements a position. This has been the situation for years now. Which is why he turns around and says "I never meant that!" when someone outright says "So you mean Seddie is going to happen?"

1) Dan gets question where fan says 'please don't disapoint us Seddiers'.

2) Dan then replies saying "I need Nathan on the show". Doesn't say what for. Doesn't say if it's Seddie relationship or Seddie friendship.

3) Someone outright tells him "This means Seddie is going to happen!"

4) Dan says "That's not what I said". Which means his original point about Nathan doesn't confirm Seddie at all. At most it might indicate a preference. But it's not a concrete thing.

His word is worthless for shippers.

Nathan isn't signed on to do the show, Freddie is not going to be a main character. From what Dan says it seems to me like he thinks he might be able to have Freddie in a guest spot in an episode and any reference to Seddie is just that "Sam and Freddie" together without meaning romantically.

Dan's words are empty and hollow for anyone looking for shipping evidence. Don't waste your time on it.

But they haven't sunk Seddie yet so that's still open. Creddie is still viable, and the most recently confirmed shipping moment was Freddie's new crush on Carly in the restaurant episode. The situation hasn't changed.