Talk:Seddie/@comment-4184884-20130602141543

We can have our own opinions on whether or not what Carly and Freddie did was wrong, based on our own personal values and beliefs. For instance, I still think Freddie was in the wrong for letting Carly kiss him and then cheering about it when, only hours before, he'd asked Sam out again, clearly indicating that it'd been on his mind and that he wanted to go out with her again. And I think Carly was in the wrong, to a much much lesser extent, for kissing him in the first place.

(Though to her credit, I doubt Sam ever told Carly the extent of her feelings for Freddie or about the night in the elevator. In fact, I wouldn't be surprised if she really did simply tell everyone she'd broken Freddie's nerdy little heart and ended things with him, which would certainly asuage Carly of any kiss related guilt.)

That said, it's clear Dan doesn't see anything wrong with any of the characters' behaviour. That doesn't mean I or anyone else can't see the characters' behaviours as questionable, but it does mean that it will never be treated as such. You will never see Freddie desperately apologizing and begging for forgiveness from a burned and cold-shouldered Sam (despite the popularity of such a scenario in post-iGB fic).

Dan made it clear that he saw the moment as Carly kissing a friend because she was running high on emotions and was going to miss him deeply, and Freddie letting her kiss him for the exact same reason, then cheering about it because he'd been kissed by a pretty girl. Not so much because it was Carly, but because he'd been kissed. (Still skeevy in my opinion, but whatever).

I don't agree with the logic and it all comes across as sloppy and flawed writting, but it's clear Dan simply didn't see it as wrong or as the betrayl a lot of seddiers did, and as such, will certainly never treat it as one.

Just as I imagine, that if Freddie were to kiss Sam again post-iGB on say, Sam & Cat or in a reunion episode or whatever, that Dan wouldn't see that as a betrayl to Carly at all. I don't think it's likely, but simply playing devils advocate here, I don't think he'd find it the least bit objectionable. (Though I'm sure certain creddiers would think otherwise. lol)