Talk:Seddie/@comment-3247345-20160610071217/@comment-3247345-20160615051306

It's his old work that they've been trying to copy. It's been at least 5 years since he's produced anything of value. There's also the question of how much Disney would be willing to pay. I suspect it's much lower than Nick simply because the TV stuff is a sideshow for them. They have all kinds of operations they profit from. Viacom on the other hand is very dependent on TV for revenue. I just can't see them having the same will to have Dan as Nick does. Washed up as he is Dan is probably still Nick's best hope.