User blog comment:Bolivianbacon/iSAFW: Epic or epic fail?/@comment-3213933-20110812030925

Hmm...

Well, basically, I think iSaFW was important to the show. I'm not crazy about it, but I do believe it's important.

1. Too many loose ends.

Since when does iCarly not have loose ends? In basically every episode, something strange happens and the iCarly gang doesn't talk about it again. Same with Adam. They don't need to talk about him and it wouldn't be that strange. We're all used to it. Just like with Pete. Whatever happened to him? Do we call iMSG bad because of it? No. It's perfectly believable. This happens all the time. This is iCarly we're talking about, right? Besides, lots of characters aren't brought back. It's not that surprising.

2. It was really misleading.

Yes, you're right on this one. It was misleading. But that's how Nickelodeon works and we can't blame Dan for this. It's a pretty weird reason why we should. It's Nick's fault, not Dan's. If only they weren't misleading...

3. The horrible Gibby plot.

It was a strange subplot, I'll give you that. But it wasn't horrible. I sorta liked it. Was it utterly amazing? No. But it was nice. The repetitive part was annoying, but we can let it go. Besides, Guppy is young. It's what normal young kids say. But, all in all, this subplot was a downer of the episode. That part is correct.

4. No continuation.

He does this cause Nick airs episodes out of order. He has no choice. If he did, I'm sure they're would be a continuation. But there's just no way. And why would they want to speak of it? They didn't have a fun experience. There's no reason to speak of it again. They could have spoke about it more, but what good what it have done? Nothing. So yeah.

5. The abrupt ending.

I was shocked, too, the first time viewing. I think we all were. But it wasn't really a cliffhanger. Just a disappointing ending. Adam wasn't really important, anyways.

6. The hypocritical speech.

It is not the episode flaw. It's basically the reason Dan made the episode. He knew that the Creddiers would need to expect Seddie in the episodes to come so he gave them a warning. How was it hypocritical? It was the basic purpose. Dan was telling the Creddiers to stop focusing on romance. Why? Because of now! They need to focus on comedy so as not to be hurt by the Seddie arc! And, anyways, if he made it anymore clearer, he would have given away the plot of iOMG.

7. It converted casual viewers to a ship.

Yup, it sorta did. But many people had been biding their time waiting for the proper moment to join the wiki (such as me.) They just happened to join right before iSaFW. And, anyways, Dan didn't need to "worry" about shippers; he knew Seddie would happen, anyways.

8. It led to more shipping problems.

No, it didn't. iOMG did. iSaFW was just a disappointment. And, besides, it's not his fault. Nick ruined it, not him. XD

9. No mention of Cam.

Well, of course they denied Cam. Younger kids would be asking questions, and parents would be angry. They just can't do it. There's no possible way. Sorry. :(

10. It could be used as a "way out."

I don't think he would. Dan's not that shallow.

11. Finally, it made fun of the crazy shippers.

Yeah, but it was a joke. No one should take it seriously.

So, I basically disagree. Sorry! Bye bye!