User blog comment:Lyrical Saint/Why I don't think iSaved Your life will be resolved/@comment-4402317-20111003063000/@comment-4184884-20111004170015

@HatersToTheLeft

"What I think you're failing to grasp is that it's pretty unlikely for characters in a childrens' program to differentiate between loving someone romantically and being "in love" with someone. "

This statement so much! I said something similar a while ago along the lines of, "this is a kids' show and I think that the only real delineation made here when it comes to love is "love in the platonic sense" (Carly loving Freddie as a friend, but not being in love with him) and "love in the romantic sense or in love" (Sam & Freddie being in love.)"

It's true that feelings run the gamut and love is not so black and white. But this is a children's show. Those sorts of things aren't often explored, and certainly not the grey areas of romantic love vs. being romantically in love.

I'll go on record and say that I do think there will be reference to Creddie in the future (for the sake of burying it once and for all), but going all out with it and actually having Carly develop real, true feelings for Freddie, having Freddie fully reciprocate and then having to deal with the Sam aspect of it all...just seems a rather messy proposition for a children's show with only a handful of episodes left, no? I will say anything is possible, especially with Dan, but there are a variety of reasons why some options...just wouldn't be good, nor logical. There is a way to touch on Creddie if Dan wants without making it such a sticky or ambigous, Degrassi Jr. High scenario.