Talk:Seddie/@comment-3247345-20150211040638/@comment-3247345-20150212074257

Yeah, I was just gonna post another theory. Real world events aside the gas scene they cut out is violent while the other stuff is merely gross. I can definitely see why Nick might have gone after a this scene as opposed to something that's just disgusting. It's useful that to remember that there was still some rationality in Nick at this time. The batshit didn't start until 2006. So let's think about this rationally. Technically the scene does show that gas blows up when lit with a match. (Actually explosions only happens under certain circumstances, usually it's just very flammable and makes setting other things on fire very easy. Explosions are much rarer than the media portrays. Don't ask how I know this.) This in theory could give kids ideas to try this. They could end up setting a fire and Nick gets blamed and gets sued. My opinion is that networks shouldn't be blamed for parents using the TV to raise their kids, but that's the reality. They could get sued for this kind of thing. It's much less dangerous from the network's perspective to show infected injuries than having characters playing with fire (or in this case robots).