Talk:Seddie/@comment-3508470-20120330231521/@comment-7889527-20120330233833

Hmm. Well, I must say I do believe Nathan was exaggerating when he said it was abusive. But we gotta admit Sam and Freddie didn't have the healthiest relationship in the book (not abusive though) when they first started. But then they started to calm down with the arguing, and they semed fine. So calling it abusive is a little much. I don't ship, but I do think he was exaggerating. But, I'm sure he didn't have any intentions of offending/angering any of his fans/seddie fans. It's not like he shouted out "OH MY GOD! SAM AND FREDDIE-THAT'S ABUSE! ABUSE I SAY! OH MY GOD CREDDIE IS WAYYYY BETTER!!" He said what he said in a simple manner and seemed calm/and just into the conversation. I'll admit, he should not have said what he said, but I'm not angry at him. I can understand what he means when he says in real life it would be kinda abusive. In real life, fights are taken way more seriously. It wouldn't be considered as funny, like how the fans consider Sam and Freddie's bickering funny. It's not like life has a laugh track. If Sam and Freddie were real, people would most likely gossip about them and their fights/say they have an unhealthy relationship etc.

'''But they are not abusive. Abusive is an emotionally/physically dangerous relationship etc. '''Sam and Freddie ended up okay, and it's not like there was any hitting/over the top screaming etc. I think he was exaggerating but I don't want to be angry at him. I mean, he even said that seddie is interesting, or something like that lol. (I'm sure you know the exact words that were said about that in the interview)

At the end of the day, I just shrugged it off.

Oh, and since I read the whole thing. I deserve a hug. So hug me. No, that wasn't creepy at all. HUG ME! XD