User blog comment:3cooldog92/Very strange KCAs/@comment-3180503-20150329150958

Okay, honestly, I can see both sides to this. I understand why the McCurdians are upset. The truth is she didn't need to be there. But now none of you can shame Nathan or Ariana for supporting Nick (or subsequently not supporting her). She now represents "the man" just as much as anyone else.

I think now that Jennette is about to potentially enter the mainstream, she knew she had to change her attitude and put all these petty feuds behind her (I'm thinking maybe City made her do this to clean up her image--along with encouraging the interview positivity). I know this essentially ruins her "freedom fighter" angle but let's face it: Her brutal "honesty" just made her come off as callous and cruel. And I still believe ditching her co-stars last year wasn't cool.

Also, I think we might be overestimating how badly Jennette was actually mistreated. Is it so hard to swallow that maybe she overreacted last year and acted like an entitled brat? I think if she's willing to put whatever happened behind her, it means that a.) she's matured (finally!) and b.) their "mistreatement" wasn't as grandiose as she made it seem.

At first I thought she was lying in the interviews, but all this seems to suggest that none of this was ever actually a big deal. However, she still can't admit to herself that she started up the drama rumors and instead she pinned it on the fans.

Ah, well. Baby steps. xP