User blog comment:Truefriend101/Creddiers/iLove You Opinions/@comment-4402317-20110929062252/@comment-4402317-20110930152431

@Truefriend

I think you are misunderstanding me. You can love someone and not have it platonic. Being "in love" is a totally different experience than loving someone. I'm not sure how old you are, or if you have been in a romantic relationship but what usually happens is you go from

crush --- like --- love(platonic/romantic) --- and in love

I'm saying that you can love someone, but not be "in love" with them. You can love them romantically, you can have intense feelings for a person, date them for several years, be intimidate and never get to that "in love" status.

If Freddie and Sam were really in love with one another they would not have broken up. Why? Because there would be no need to, they would have accepted each others differences and moved on with their relationship. The fact that they did break up means that they have doubts in their relationship. So yes, they know that they "love" one another. I personally think they are trying to see if it means just simply platonic or something more at this point. Obviously it looks like the ladder, but the point still stands that when you "in love" with someone that you don't break up, you don't have doubts, because when you're "in love" you are ALL the way in, and there is no turning back.