User blog comment:Creddie 4 real/Creddie Fans: iOMG/@comment-3513740-20110410131537/@comment-3276102-20110410150040

Just for the record, I am a non-shipper. I am opposed to both the Creddie and Seddie relationships (although I fully support Creddie Friendship and Seddie Friendship).

@ TeamMu :

I completely agree with you. I made that very same point in a blog a while back, about how some Seddiers seem to want to have their cake and eat it, too. They dismiss iSaved Your Life as being meaningless, that the one kiss in iKiss was more meaningful than all of the Creddie kisses put together, that Carly looked like she was trying "to eat Freddie's face," and so forth ... and then they turn around and say, "Creddiers already got iSYL, they should be happy with that, it's our turn now!"

They can't have it both ways. They can't say that the Carly/Freddie relationship in iSYL wasn't a "real" relationship, that it didn't mean anything, that Carly and Freddie were never really together for real, and then argue that Creddiers have already gotten theirs.

A Seddier who responded to my blog agreed with me and said that either of those two points of view could be valid, but they completely cancel each other out when taken together.

Along the same lines, I've noticed that, over time, the Seddiers have often said, "Trust in quality, not quantity," when arguing that the kiss in iKiss" was so much more meaningful than the ones in iSaved Your Life.''

And then later they say, "Well, the Creddiers got 6 or 7 kisses, and we've only gotten one!" or "They got a 36-minute kiss, we only got an 8-second kiss!"

It's interesting how quality always trumps quantity ... except when it suits somebody's purposes to claim that quantity is the overriding factor. This sort of thing is not unique to Seddiers, by the way, or iCarly fans in general.

I no longer place much stock in the "The Creddiers got 6 or 7 kisses, the Seddiers only got 1!" (or two, as the case may now be), simply because the Seddiers themselves evidently don't place much stock in it.