Talk:Seddie/@comment-5679407-20130630014216

I think I'm getting a bit of a feel for Sam & Cat. It's reminiscent of Drake & Josh--the only exception being that there's really no moral imperative in the show. What I mean by that is that there doesn't seem to be a "moral of the story," as would be found in iCarly or D&J. This isn't particularly bad, but when coupled with the series' episodic tone and for the most part, disposable storylines, it gives me the impression that the writers will just "go with the flow." I think few plots, if any, will be approached in a serious vein, and that doesn't do much for my prospects of the show--least of all, any expectations of Freddie's cameo. I think Dan will just make a convenient reference to their past romance, and keep the tone light, perpetuating his tease of Seddiers indefinitely. Of course, this is all just speculation, but I'm going to trust my instincts this time around.

As for Jeanette's comments, I wouldn't put much stalk in to her tales, so to speak. She's allowed to express her opinions, no matter how disappointing one might find them. Whether this means that she has an authoritative input in the show's creative, has yet to be determined. As with all things concerning his shows, Dan makes the decisions. I do think, however, that he considers the actors'/actresses' opinions when it comes to performing, but I think that's as far as it goes. An example would be that I don't think Dan would force Jeanette and Nathan to be more "convincing" when performing for Seddie--particularly the comfort the convey when kissing each other. All the same, I don't think Jeanette's opinion of Seddie had any influence in what was ultimately Dan's blunder.

I think I can finally let go. It is sad, though, considering what Seddie was and what it had the potential to be. But, no more crying over spilled milk.