Talk:Creddie/@comment-4542190-20130307142028/@comment-5679407-20130309162850

I'm assuming that this was all instigated by the argument you, Godlovesusall, and I were having on the Seddie page. You have a tendency to resort to sarcasm and insults when you fail to make a valid point. And when a Seddier disagrees with you, you cry out "anti-creddie." I have no problem with your comings and goings on the Seddie page, but if you're coming to debate, then come to debate. You play a martyr everytime someone expresses an opinion other than yours, and you act as though [we're] the ones doing something bad by expressing our views.

If you disagree with me, then you disagree with me. That's fine--I imagine that there are a lot of Creddiers and Seddiers who are put off by what I say. But then it falls on you to either: explain why you disagree or not respond, if a debate isn't worth it. You complain about how some Seddiers don't see the Creddie moments you see. And that's the key difference: [we] are not going to see Creddie the way you do; you aren't going to see Seddie the way that we do. If you want to put to rest some of the "anti-creddie" sentiments on the Seddie page, then come up with a thoughtful argument. Don't condescend, insult, and rely on sarcasm, as if that's going to validate your point.

If this style of discussion isn't your cup of tea, then do as Lotstar said, and just refrain from arguing with those whom you disagree.