Talk:Creddie/@comment-5128403-20120708213844/@comment-4184884-20120708235230

There really isn't proof per se. He's never said he was or anything. Some people just think he is because of the way he's treated seddie and seddiers in the past as opposed to creddie/creddiers. Just assumptions really.

Like Cameddie said though, more than anything Dan is a troll.